This Week’s Events
David Benatar, The Badness of Death for Animals
Monday, January 27, 2025 - 04 pm - 06 pm
► To stay informed about other upcoming events at the Centre for Ethics, opportunities, and more, please sign up for our newsletter.
The Badness of Death for Animals
How bad is death (itself, rather than the process of dying) for non-human animals? The most common answers to this question, even by many animal liberationists, are either “not at all” or “much less bad than it is for humans”. Both of those answers, I shall argue, are unsustainable. Once we understand the various reasons why death is bad for humans, we must reach the conclusion that while death is not equally bad for all, how bad it is does not neatly track the human/non-human divide. Nor does one need to be a “person” for death to be very bad. Thus, death is much worse for many animals than most people think.
► This event is in-person. Join in person at the Centre for Ethics (Larkin Building room 200).
David Benatar
Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Cape Town
Stefan Macleod, Cash Crisis: Between Market Fundamentals and Political Judgment
Wednesday, January 29, 2025 - 12 pm - 02 pm
► To stay informed about other upcoming events at the Centre for Ethics, opportunities, and more, please sign up for our newsletter.
Cash Crisis: Between Market Fundamentals and Political Judgment
I argue that contemporary monetary policy is characterized by a tension between two implicit social theoretic conceptions of money. On the one hand, “exchange-commodity” theories conceptualize money as fundamentally a means of exchange whose primary function is to represent exchange ratios between real commodities on the market. This view cast monetary policy as a politically benign matter of stabilizing the money supply in pursuit of stable and efficient exchange in the real economy. On the other hand, “chartalist” theories conceptualize money as a token of debt settlement. Here, money tokenizes the political judgment of the state and plays both a discretionary and constitutive, rather than merely stabilizing role in the market. Neither conception is entirely convincing, yet central banks’ response to financial crises tend to be justified inconsistently in terms familiar to both conceptions. The result is a politically unstable policy environment in which policies affirm imperatives of following market “fundamentals”, but which also seem to illustrate significant political discretion on the part of central banks. I sketch a potential political crisis that could result from this tension, before turning to a potential solution in global monetary institutions.
► This event is in-person. Join in person at the Centre for Ethics (Larkin Building room 200).
Stefan Macleod
Political Science
University of Toronto